Four experts on the American presidency review the only three impeachment cases from history—against Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon, and Bill Clinton—and explore its power and meaning for today.
Impeachment is rare, and for good reason. Designed to check tyrants, the process of impeachment outlined in the Constitution is what Thomas Jefferson called “the most formidable weapon for the purpose of a dominant faction that was ever contrived.” On the one hand, it nullifies the will of voters, the basic foundation of all representative democracies. On the other, its absence from the Constitution would leave the country vulnerable to despotic leadership. Only three times has a president’s conduct led to such political disarray as to warrant his potential removal from office, transforming a political crisis into a constitutional one. None has yet succeeded. Andrew Johnson was impeached in 1868 for failing to kowtow to congressional leaders—and in a large sense, for failing to be Abraham Lincoln—yet survived his Senate trial. Richard Nixon resigned in July of 1974 after the House Judiciary Committee approved three articles of impeachment for lying, obstructing justice, and employing his executive power for personal and political gain. Bill Clinton had an affair with a White House intern, but in 1999 faced trial in the Senate less for that prurient act than for lying under oath about it.
In the first book to consider these three presidents alone, and the one thing they have in common, Jeffrey A. Engel, Jon Meacham, Timothy Naftali, and Peter Baker explain that impeachment is a political process more than it is a legal verdict. The Constitution states that the president, “shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors,” leaving room for historical precedent and the temperament of the time to weigh heavily on each case. These three cases highlight factors beyond the president’s behavior that impact the likelihood and outcome of an impeachment: the president’s relationship with Congress, the power and resilience of the office itself, and the polarization of the moment. This is a realist, rather than hypothetical, view of impeachment that looks to history for clues about its future.
Story Locale: Washington, DC; The United States of America
AUTHOR PLATFORMS: Expert scholars and journalists of the American presidency, each of the four authors makes regular TV news appearances on major networks, including CNN, PBS, MSNBC, and Fox; and they write regularly for popular audiences in newspapers and magazines, including The New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Time, Slate, and Foreign Affairs.
CLEAR NEWS HOOK: This history is an opportunity to reflect on our times, and though the authors conclude that impeachment is a difficult, unlikely process, each impeachment from American history speaks specifically to the current administration, whether it’s Johnson’s embattled relationship with Congress, Nixon taking advantage of the presidency’s power, or Clinton’s polarizing leadership.
Marketing: Pre-pub consumer outreach and review push
Online marketing outreach
Targeted email marketing
Random House e-newsletters and websites
Publicity: National media attention
National/local review and feature print attention
National/local radio attention
Online review and feature attention